Java Forum / General / February 2006
Java User Groups
Michael Redlich - 07 Feb 2006 17:40 GMT Folks:
I am sure that a lot of you belong to some kind of Java Users Group. It's an excellent resource for the exchange of information, ideas, skills, and know-how. And when you have the opportunity to host guest speakers, such as industry experts and representatives from companies like JBoss or Borland, it is indeed a huge benefit to that users group.
If any of you happen to be a Java Users Group leader like me, you know that spreading the word about a guest speaker is very important. You obviously want to maximize attendance at that particular meeting.
When Ivis Technologies sent two representatives to make a presentation at last December's ACGNJ Java Users Group meeting, I posted that information about the upcoming meeting on these groups. Being new to these groups at the time, I didn't think it was a problem. However, one person rudely made me aware that this was a big no-no. I would have appreciated a more respectible response. I was immediately labeled a "spammer" in his eyes, and things got a little ugly since I admitedly over-reacted as well.
So, this leads me to a request for feedback from you...
I was thinking about starting a new Google Group that would deal solely with information about Java User Groups around the world. Any Java Users Group leader would be able to post information about their particular group and upcoming meetings, especially those that involve a guest speaker, like, say, Bruce Eckel. You would be free from silly, immature comments and knee-jerk reactions of threats to be "plonked." This medium would be excellent for those parts of the world that have a dense contingent of Java developers, like, say NYC, San Francisco, Germany, and wherever else in Europe.
So I would appreciate your most candid feedback. If you think that this is a bad idea, then I need to know that.
Thanks in advance...
Mike.
----- ACGNJ Java Users Group http://www.javasig.org/
Monique Y. Mudama - 07 Feb 2006 17:47 GMT [snip]
> I was thinking about starting a new Google Group that would deal > solely with information about Java User Groups around the world. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > So I would appreciate your most candid feedback. If you think that > this is a bad idea, then I need to know that. I would suggest a regular newsgroup, not a google group.
 Signature monique
Ask smart questions, get good answers: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Oliver Wong - 07 Feb 2006 18:14 GMT > [snip] > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > I would suggest a regular newsgroup, not a google group. Getting a new newsgroup is a non-trivial task though. What about using comp.lang.java.announce, if it isn't already overrun with bot posts?
- Oliver
Chris Smith - 07 Feb 2006 18:39 GMT > Getting a new newsgroup is a non-trivial task though. What about using > comp.lang.java.announce, if it isn't already overrun with bot posts? User group announcements are DEFINITELY welcome on the comp.lang.java.announce newsgroup. I don't see the problem with them here either, but as an unmoderated group, anyone who likes can object to something here.
However, there's a bit of moderation issue for clj.announce. Jon Skeet and I are the only moderators, and Jon doesn't even follow Java newsgroups any longer. If a few people (who I know from the groups, since there's a bit of a trust issue) would volunteer to moderate the group on occasion, then this could work.
 Signature www.designacourse.com The Easiest Way To Train Anyone... Anywhere.
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer MindIQ Corporation
Michael Redlich - 08 Feb 2006 13:45 GMT > User group announcements are DEFINITELY welcome on the > comp.lang.java.announce newsgroup. I don't see the problem with them [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > since there's a bit of a trust issue) would volunteer to moderate the > group on occasion, then this could work. Chris:
I just subscribed to the clj.announce group and had a peek at the content. That would work for me. I didn't realize this group existed. Using an established group solves two issues:
(a) not having to worry about setting up a new one (obviously...) (b) announcing the new group to the other groups (which could potentially annoy those that take exception to such posts).
I'd be more-than-happy to help moderate clja. I already "own" and moderate the Yahoo! Groups that I have for the ACGNJ Java Users Group that I run, so I would be comfortable moderating clja.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Mike.
----- ACGNJ Java Users Group http://www.javasig.org/
Monique Y. Mudama - 07 Feb 2006 21:13 GMT >> I would suggest a regular newsgroup, not a google group. > > Getting a new newsgroup is a non-trivial task though. What about > using comp.lang.java.announce, if it isn't already overrun with > bot posts? I'm not terribly familiar with google groups, but isn't it the case that google groups mirrors newsgroups, but newsgroup servers won't carry google groups? That's why I suggested newsgroups.
 Signature monique
Ask smart questions, get good answers: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Oliver Wong - 07 Feb 2006 22:27 GMT >>> I would suggest a regular newsgroup, not a google group. >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > that google groups mirrors newsgroups, but newsgroup servers won't > carry google groups? That's why I suggested newsgroups. Yes, that's correct. I had assumed you meant for the OP to try to petition for the creation of a new newsgroup, to which I claimed was relatively difficult (especially compared to the creation of a new google group).
- Oliver
Monique Y. Mudama - 07 Feb 2006 22:45 GMT >> I'm not terribly familiar with google groups, but isn't it the case >> that google groups mirrors newsgroups, but newsgroup servers won't [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > was relatively difficult (especially compared to the creation of a > new google group). Well, I did mean that. If you want people to make use of something, you make it as easy to access as possible, even if that means creating a newsgroup. Then again, I guess you then need to convince servers to actually carry said newsgroup ... yeah, that could be a pain.
I've never actually tried to create a newsgroup, so I only have the vaguest idea of what might be involved.
 Signature monique
Ask smart questions, get good answers: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Oliver Wong - 08 Feb 2006 14:56 GMT >>> I'm not terribly familiar with google groups, but isn't it the case >>> that google groups mirrors newsgroups, but newsgroup servers won't [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I've never actually tried to create a newsgroup, so I only have the > vaguest idea of what might be involved. Me too, but according to http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/creating-newsgroups/part1/
<quote> group-mentors@acpub.duke.edu is a body of volunteers experienced with the newsgroup creation process. They assist people who want to propose new groups with the formation and submission of a good proposal. It is strongly encouraged, though not required, that they be contacted with an outline of the basic idea for a proposal, and a mentor will work with the proponents to submit a formal proposal. People who have experience with the process and wish to help others should contact group-mentors-request@acpub.duke.edu to join.
1) A request for discussion on creation of a new newsgroup should be posted to news.announce.newgroups, news.groups, and any other groups or mailing lists at all related to the proposed topic if desired. news.announce.newgroups is moderated, and the Followup-to: header will be set so that the actual discussion takes place only in news.groups. Users on sites which have difficulty posting to moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups to newgroups@isc.org. The proposal must be in the format defined in "How to Format and Submit a New Group Proposal", a pointer to which is at the end of this message.
The article should be cross-posted among the newsgroups, including news.announce.newgroups, rather than posted as separate articles. Note that standard behaviour for posting software is to not present the articles in any groups when cross-posted to a moderated group; the moderator will handle that for you.
2) The name and charter of the proposed group and whether it will be moderated or unmoderated (and if the former, who the moderator(s) will be) should be determined during the discussion period. If there is no general agreement on these points among the proponents of a new group at the end of 30 days of discussion, the discussion should be taken offline (into mail instead of news.groups) and the proponents should iron out the details among themselves. Once that is done, a new, more specific proposal may be made, going back to step 1) above.
3) Group advocates seeking help in choosing a name to suit the proposed charter, or looking for any other guidance in the creation procedure, can send a message to group-advice@isc.org; a few seasoned news administrators are available through this address. </quote>
And it goes on and on...
I ran my own private news server for a short while. If you do that, you can create any groups you want, but then the problem is getting people to subscribe to your news server. Eclipse runs their own news server, for example.
- Oliver
Michael Redlich - 10 Feb 2006 18:01 GMT Folks:
Thanks for all of your feedback. I appreciate it very much.
I have decided to use the existing comp.lang.java.announce (clja) group. This makes sense. I also volunteered to assist in moderating the content since there was a need for additional moderators.
So for those of you that are Java Users Group leaders, please keep clja in mind if you have a need to make announcements regarding guest speakers at your respective user groups. And for everyone else, please check in from time-to-time. You never know when you'll catch an opportunity to meet an industry expert in your area.
Sincerely,
Mike.
----- ACGNJ Java Users Group http://www.javasig.org/
John O'Conner - 07 Feb 2006 22:22 GMT > So I would appreciate your most candid feedback. If you think that > this is a bad idea, then I need to know that. Personally, I think cljp can easily accommodate a JUG announcement or two. I've been off and on this particular group for years. Once in a while a self appointed cop comes along, stays a while, and finally leaves after realizing he can't control everyone.
You can't please everyone with your post. Newsgroups have changed over the years for sure...and a lot more stuff is tolerated today than ever before. And it aint gonna get any less tolerant...if cljp doesn't have the signal/noise ratio that people want, they'll leave to find other resources. This ng has evolved too, and I wouldn't worry too much about what a few people think...if it's related to java programming, java apis, java design, java questions, java topics, it can't be too far off if it falls into cljp...the catchall of Java newsgroups even if it wasn't originally intended to be.
-- John O'Conner
P.Hill - 08 Feb 2006 03:34 GMT > Personally, I think cljp can easily accommodate a JUG announcement or > two. Actually, having been a JUG director, I wouldn't stay on cljp just to see announcements about speakers to get ideas. It seems like a specialty group might have it's own discussions about who might be contacted to provide a speaker. Long threads about using some JaveOne video or how to break up a meeting in parts etc. seems a bit tangential to cljp. Getting a bunch of people together with a fixed focus (filling meetings with speakers) seems like a great use for a google group. I am a member a 7 such groups ranging from parents in my area to people with an interest in a particular sport, and have read Usenet on and off for years. Given that, I'd say user group discussion of speakers is more a group/mailing list then a newsgroup. The disadvantage of a list is that many might not know you exist, so you'd have to advertise by putting meeting announcements in more general places: like this newsgroup.
I also note that there is set of mailings lists on SDN. https://jugs.dev.java.net/
You might peak at that to see if it is active.
-Paul
Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
|
|