> Whilst its appreciated...I see 2 main problems with this...
>
> 1) Where are its own unit tests?
>> Whilst its appreciated...I see 2 main problems with this...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> If you are willing to pay, you can certainly forward your
> requirements.
Yes we all know this.
Otherwise I suggest you add on to the module
> what you feel is mising and then publish your improved version.
The point of JUnit is to unit test code...JUnit itself is covered with
tests, and almost all add ons and extensions are summarily unit tested.
>> 2) Its Java 1.5 where as JUnit (and most people using it) is 1.4.x
>
> Again, I suggest you back-port to 1.4 and publish your version.
I don't need the feature at all, I was merely stating that creating an
add-on for a free tool that is not able to be used by the majority of
the free tools user is a waste.
If the op wants to use J1.5, then their time might be better spent
creating the add on for JUnit 4.0 which is just about to be released.
JUnit 4.0 makes full use of J1.5 - indeed its a complete rewrite, using
annotations instead of base classes for test case/suite identification.
> (And I'd like a reference to the "most people using it"-survey
> for exact numbers).
Like most NG posts, there are no numbers to back up the claim, only
empirical evidence that one gets from being in the general community
that uses the tool. If you like you could always create a survey on the
yahoo Junit list, to tell us.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/
There's 6605 members currently...should give us a good representative
picture of JDK version.
Jacob - 20 Jan 2006 08:03 GMT
> I don't need the feature at all, I was merely stating that creating an
> add-on for a free tool that is not able to be used by the majority of
> the free tools user is a waste.
It's not a waste at all. *I* needed the feature, and *I* happen to
work with jdk1.5 and I created the feature for *myself*, and it
fulfills my needs exactly.
As I found that it could be useful for others I posted it here.
I don't really care about the community "majority", if nobody can
benefit from the initiative that's fine. If you don't like it, or
can't use it, or find it insufficient in some way then please don't
care about it :-)