 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Java Forum / General / December 2005Obfuscator
What obfuscators handle 1.5? Any comparisons of obfuscators out there? Thanks John DashO Java obfuscator http://www.preemptive.com/products/dasho works well for my apps. Sam A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator. The obfuscator should rename Packages, Classes, Methods and Fields using aggressive obfuscator techniques The obfuscator should stop decompilers from producing usable results The obfuscator should use Advanced Control Flow Obfuscation String Encryption features should be included with the obfuscator Software watermarking is a feature offered by some obfuscator tools to help track piracy An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the obfuscator to provide Class and method level optimization to improve JIT performance. The obfuscator should also have Unused Class/Method/Field and constant pool entry removal. An obfuscator can also provide dynamically-loaded class (forname) detection Professional obfuscator models can support efficient Java code development and deployment. The obfuscator should versions up to 1.5. An obfuscator should provide Incremental Obfuscation An obfuscator should provide Automated Stack Trace Translation An obfuscator should provide Packaging into directories or jars An obfuscator should support packaging any type of Java - applications, libraries, applets, servlets, EJBs, etc. An obfuscator should support fJ2ME CLDC based profiles An obfuscator should recognize CLDC pre-verified library classes Obfuscator output should retain 100% pure Java and passes verifiers Obfuscator control should include command-line interface suitable for integrating into build environments. The obfuscator should include a comprehensive User's Guide The obfuscator should support for Generic Types and Methods The obfuscator should provide granular configuration. A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator. The obfuscator should rename Packages, Classes, Methods and Fields using aggressive obfuscator techniques The obfuscator should stop decompilers from producing usable results The obfuscator should use Advanced Control Flow Obfuscation String Encryption features should be included with the obfuscator Software watermarking is a feature offered by some obfuscator tools to help track piracy An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the obfuscator to provide Class and method level optimization to improve JIT performance. The obfuscator should also have Unused Class/Method/Field and constant pool entry removal. An obfuscator can also provide dynamically-loaded class (forname) detection Professional obfuscator models can support efficient Java code development and deployment. The obfuscator should versions up to 1.5. An obfuscator should provide Incremental Obfuscation An obfuscator should provide Automated Stack Trace Translation An obfuscator should provide Packaging into directories or jars An obfuscator should support packaging any type of Java - applications, libraries, applets, servlets, EJBs, etc. An obfuscator should support fJ2ME CLDC based profiles An obfuscator should recognize CLDC pre-verified library classes Obfuscator output should retain 100% pure Java and passes verifiers Obfuscator control should include command-line interface suitable for integrating into build environments. The obfuscator should include a comprehensive User's Guide The obfuscator should support for Generic Types and Methods The obfuscator should provide granular configuration. The DashO java obfuscator http://www.preemptive.com is a reasonable choice as they focus on obfuscators >A Java Obfuscator should offer maximum protection against reverse > engineering, as this is the main reason to buy an obfuscator. [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > The DashO java obfuscator http://www.preemptive.com is a reasonable > choice as they focus on obfuscators Spam? -- LTP :) >>The obfuscator should provide granular configuration. >>The DashO java obfuscator http://www.p(...)tive.com is a reasonable >>choice as they focus on obfuscators >Spam? There is no need to completely quote advertisements (unless you would get paid by the advertisers to do so). I would not have seen this message at all, if you would not have quoted it, because my message filter had suppressed it. `"Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@cc.usu.edu> wrote on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:38:00 -0700 in comp.lang.java.programmer: >Spam? If you look at the headers on the original post, you'll see this: Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.40.252.183; posting-account=Tt-DIg0AAACUPbBpGjHTEvj2F_15rk5U And in the headers of the two followups that came along in minutes, you'll see: Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.40.252.183; posting-account=frIB1A0AAACdf_8g6USvS1A7aN5GX0sA from "samprovencal@yahoo.com", and Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.40.252.183; posting-account=7-pGhA0AAAAR2W065rHUrGOblwO8QYZN from "javaobfuscator@yahoo.com". The interesting thing is that they all contain this: posting-host=69.40.252.183 which suggests that they all three originated from the same machine. So it looks like the two followups were sockpuppets on the hand of "johnigrant@yahoo.com". Personally, I don't think it would have been out of line if the guy just posted an announcement for his product. It is on-topic, after all.  Signature"If you are seriously interested in fighting for a better world, begin by identifying the nature of the problem. The battle is primarily intellectual (philosophical), not political. Politics is the last consequence, the practical implementation, of the fundamental (metaphysical-epistimological-ethical) ideas that dominate a given nation's culture. You cannot fight or change the consequences without fighting and changing the cause; nor can you attempt any practical implementation without knowing what you want to implement." --Ayn Rand, *Philosophy, Who Needs It* "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@cc.usu.edu> wrote in message news:43ae304a$0$7789 <snip> >> An obfuscator can improve code efficiency. Look for the >> obfuscator to>> choice as they focus on obfuscators > > Spam? I just read that in South Korea the folks like spam (the one in the tin.) When we were poor (long time ago) we used to get a meat product that resembled spam, but was much less tastey. > -- > LTP > > :) > "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@cc.usu.edu> wrote in message > news:43ae304a$0$7789 [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > When we were poor (long time ago) we used to get a meat product that > resembled spam, but was much less tastey. I think society's public sentiment against spam led to the invention of a new word, an acronym for unwanted advertising. The original acronym has been all but lost but the word itself persists! SignatureLTP :) On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:18:55 -0700, "Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamlicious_z_XXX_m@cc.usu.edu> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >I think society's public sentiment against spam led to the invention of a >new word, an acronym for unwanted advertising. The original acronym has >been all but lost but the word itself persists! SPAM was originally canned ham. It is popular in Samoa. Monty Python did a sketch about it where everything on the menu contains spam. That lead to its metaphorical use as something ubiquitous you can't get away from. SignatureCanadian Mind Products, Roedy Green. http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching. > SPAM was originally canned ham. No. Canned ham is *not* canned SPiced hAM. >..It is popular in Samoa. I don't mind it here, either. Recently*, the English company that coined the word successfully stopped anti-spam software being released with the word spam in the name. * ..last year, or so? SignatureAndrew Thompson physci, javasaver, 1point1c, lensescapes - athompson.info/andrew > Recently*, the English company that coined the word > successfully stopped anti-spam software being released > with the word spam in the name. Apparently Hormel has failed in its attempt to stop Spam Arrest: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/03/hormel_spam_campaign/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/31/spam_ruling/ However maybe you were thinking of this, where a self admitted spammer tried to launch a line of "spam king" clothing: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/17/spam_king_roasting/ IANAL, but was under the impression that tradmarks were registered in various specific categories, and that infringement could only occur if there was a distinct possibility (or intent) of confusion between the offendor and the original, which to me hardly seems likely between a "meat" product and computer software or services. Quoting from the first Register article above: "When even legislation (e.g. the CAN-SPAM Act) uses the word spam as a generic term for unsolicited commercial email it is time to concede that a meaning, whether desirable or not, has become ingrained in the language." /gordon Signature[ do not email me copies of your followups ] g o r d o n + n e w s @ b a l d e r 1 3 . s e Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.