hi..
somone has told that struts is no longer a viable option as JSF will
take it's place, and any new web application should not use struts.
Viator - 15 Dec 2005 08:25 GMT
Well struts is around for many years now and already a vast majority of
J2EE developers are using it in projects. JSF is cetrainly more
powerful and flexible than struts. But, it will take a while for JSF to
replace struts if ever it succeds in doing that.
For a comparison see:
http://websphere.sys-con.com/read/46516.htm
Bryce - 15 Dec 2005 15:50 GMT
>hi..
>
>somone has told that struts is no longer a viable option as JSF will
>take it's place, and any new web application should not use struts.
Why not? Struts is still as useful as it was a few years ago. Granted,
there are many more options out there, such as JSF, WebWork, Tapestry,
Spring MVC, just to name a few.
Does this mean that Struts is not a viable option? No.

Signature
Last year I went to Iraq. Before Team America showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.
Thomas Hawtin - 15 Dec 2005 19:02 GMT
> somone has told that struts is no longer a viable option as JSF will
> take it's place, and any new web application should not use struts.
It looks to me as if JSF is having an extended period of being unproven.
It's all a bit (pre-Java EE 5) EJB.
With respect to Struts, it's probably worth taking a look at this thread
"WebWork merging with Struts to become Struts Ti" on theserverside.
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37794
Tom Hawtin

Signature
Unemployed English Java programmer
http://jroller.com/page/tackline/