> ....
>> If you convert your Applet to an Application, and then deploy it with
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> If you JWS an applet you can also access the same services..
> My understanding was that if you use JWS with an applet, you had to sign
> the applet,
Nope. <http://www.physci.org/pc/jtest-applet.jnlp>
I definitely did not sign that.
>...and so the user would have to say whether or not (s)he trusts
> the signature. Trusting the signature in this situation gives full control
> to applet, creating an "all or nothing" situation.
Same applies to JWS'd applets and applications, they either request
all-permissions or none - there is nothing in between.
> In contrast, using JWS with an application, you can request specific
> services, and JWS would tell the user WHICH services were being requested,
> so that the user could give the application only partial control over the
> system.
Nope, see above.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
physci, javasaver, 1point1c, lensescapes - athompson.info/andrew
Andrew Thompson - 17 Dec 2005 00:25 GMT
(Oliver W.)
>> In contrast, using JWS with an application, you can request
>> specific services, and JWS would tell the user WHICH services were
>> being requested, so that the user could give the application only
>> partial control over the system.
>
> Nope, see above.
When you throw permissions set in 'policy files' into the mix,
your comments make more sense.
People may have been used to allowing applets (or applications)
particular permissions via the policy files, whereas JWS is 'all
or nothing'.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
physci, javasaver, 1point1c, lensescapes - athompson.info/andrew