
Signature
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:57:06 GMT, Tris Orendorff
> <triso@remove-me.cogeco.ca> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> this has a rather onerous licensing restriction:
I do not think that is particularly onerous, given
what Google is offering for free.
...
> It does not make sense for Google to offer an API since they make
> their money displaying ads.
(shrugs) If the availability of the API encourages development
of commercial uses of Google (I understand Google limits the
number of searches you can do per day for free, but you can
pay for extra searches).
>..Perhaps this restriction is a temporary
> one while the API is in beta.
I do not see any reason why Google whould choose to
change that. They are a commercial entity, not a charity.
[ Oh, and yes, yes.. I do realise the information that
Google indexes belongs to the page authors rather than Google,
that is irrelevant. We could (conceivably) make our own
web crawler/search bot/indexing engine and end up with the
results we want, but if we choose to use Google's index, it
is obviously the index itself that is the 'added value' here. ]
Roedy Green - 08 Nov 2005 04:40 GMT
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 04:17:01 GMT, Andrew Thompson
<seemysites@www.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
who said :
>I do not think that is particularly onerous, given
>what Google is offering for free.
This is little point in writing code that can be used by only one
person, and/or that cannot be sold.

Signature
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
Andrew Thompson - 08 Nov 2005 05:19 GMT
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 04:17:01 GMT, Andrew Thompson
> <seemysites@www.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> This is little point in writing code that can be used by only one
> person..
As I understand it '1 account' does not mean '1 person'.
If I expose the Google API via my web pages, I
('WebMaster') have '1 account' with Google, but
my 'n' users do not require any form of Google account,
just the link to my web page. My users can then make a
(very limited) number of searches before Google
says 'no more for today - unless WebMaster upgrades to..*'
* ..and that is where the commercial aspect comes in.
(shrugs) As I understand it (based mostly on the perhaps
flawed conclusions above), it can work quite well for
a specialised search of your own site, and if you hit
the limit of daily searches on a regular basis, it might
be worth considering the upgrade.
Personally, I am happy to use the kind of search I suspect
you have on your site. A little search box that specifies
our own domain name in a hidden field, and dumps the visitor
to the Google search page, complete with the Google adds (I
assume my users know roughly what they are looking for, and
hope they are not too easily distraced by the Google ads!)
Apparently you can even 'inform' the Google results
page to adopt the styles of your own site, but I have
never bothered taking it that far.
> .., and/or that cannot be sold.
Again - I believe you *can* commercialise your Google
related products, but Google (understandably) wants some
form of 'cut' of that, given it is their index which feeds
current data to the application.
Of course, IANAL, that is just my current understanding.