
Signature
"Yo' ideas need to be thinked befo' they are say'd" - Ian Lamb, age 3.5
http://www.cs.queensu.ca/~dalamb/ qucis->cs to reply (it's a long story...)
>>Why don't you put this information on your site instead of here???
>
> Oh, I dunno, maybe because so many of us in this newsgroup rely on his
> site,
> which wasn't working?
Many of us in this newsgroup rely on a plenty of sites.
Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in this
newsgroup that it has been offline for some time?
No.
Benji - 02 Nov 2005 23:12 GMT
> Many of us in this newsgroup rely on a plenty of sites.
> Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in this
> newsgroup that it has been offline for some time?
> No.
*shrug* it doesn't hurt anybody. sun wouldn't notify the newsgroup
because they don't have any interest in the newsgroup. It seems that Roedy
spends a lot of his time posting here.
No, it probably wasn't too useful, but it doesn't make sense to get upset
about it either. an upset post is just as off-topic as a "my website is
down" post.

Signature
Of making better designs there is no end,
and much refactoring wearies the body.
Moloch - 03 Nov 2005 00:42 GMT
> *shrug* it doesn't hurt anybody. sun wouldn't notify the newsgroup
> because they don't have any interest in the newsgroup. It seems that
> Roedy
> spends a lot of his time posting here.
So? Why should I care about Roedy's interest in this group? It's an
unmoderated public newsgroup remember?
> No, it probably wasn't too useful, but it doesn't make sense to get upset
> about it either. an upset post is just as off-topic as a "my website is
> down" post.
So everyone should thus shut his mouth when others doesn't act properly???
Roedy Green - 03 Nov 2005 01:50 GMT
>Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in this
>newsgroup that it has been offline for some time?
But nobody from those sites posts links to those sites to answer
questions. You can consider the site an extension to my newsgroup
postings.
Most entries there start out as newsgroup posting. When I answer the
same question several times I polish up a response by merging some of
my newsgroup answers augmented by contributions from other people and
post it there. Sometimes, like the Ajax entry, it comes almost
entirely from someone else's post.
Then as I get feedback from more newsgroups posts I keep tweaking the
post so that it becomes a generic answer to a small class of problem.
You could think of the site as the edited minutes of the newsgroups.
You may also recall there was discussion of a similar problem that
happened at Sun a few weeks back when all the tutorial links went
south. Somebody reported to the group when they were functioning
again.
Since I make it easy to find the Sun docs and tutorials though my
index, there is a good chance my site index going south would also
interfere with many people's access to the Sun material.
I think the benefits of informing people overshadow the costs of
irritating you with a technically off topic post.

Signature
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
Moloch - 03 Nov 2005 23:45 GMT
>>Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in this
>>newsgroup that it has been offline for some time?
>
> But nobody from those sites posts links to those sites to answer
> questions. You can consider the site an extension to my newsgroup
> postings.
You've got your own site. And I must admit it's a nice site. But whatever
you feel I still think it's not appropriate to post explicit messages about
*your* site being offline in this public usenet group.
> Most entries there start out as newsgroup posting. When I answer the
> same question several times I polish up a response by merging some of
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> index, there is a good chance my site index going south would also
> interfere with many people's access to the Sun material.
You don't need to tell me why / how usefull your site is. That's not the
point and like I said above you *do* have a nice site.
> I think the benefits of informing people overshadow the costs of
> irritating you with a technically off topic post.
This seems rather egocentric to me. A lot of people just don't care about
your site.
Roedy Green - 03 Nov 2005 23:51 GMT
>You've got your own site. And I must admit it's a nice site. But whatever
>you feel I still think it's not appropriate to post explicit messages about
>*your* site being offline in this public usenet group.
I disagree. Your motive for complaining has likely more do to with
the political beliefs the other part of the site gores.

Signature
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.
Benji - 04 Nov 2005 02:47 GMT
> I disagree. Your motive for complaining has likely more do to with
> the political beliefs the other part of the site gores.
That's not realistic. Your posts do come off as a bit self-serving
sometimes, since you always post a link to your site in every single
response (sometimes it's not terribly related). But I do think you're
trying to be helpful (and you are). Just realize that it can come off
as that.
So, don't play the political persecution card. It's not becoming. =P

Signature
Of making better designs there is no end,
and much refactoring wearies the body.
Luc The Perverse - 04 Nov 2005 01:40 GMT
>>>Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in
>>>this
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> you feel I still think it's not appropriate to post explicit messages
> about *your* site being offline in this public usenet group.
Look mommy! There are trolls in comp.* too
--
LTP
:)
Chris Smith - 03 Nov 2005 04:44 GMT
> Many of us in this newsgroup rely on a plenty of sites.
>
> Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in this
> newsgroup that it has been offline for some time?
I, for one, sure wouldn't mind someone posting a heads-up when
java.sun.com is down... especially if it contains useful information on
how to avoid running into problems because of it.
I don't understand what you're so upset about. Roedy's trying to help
people. Leave him alone.

Signature
www.designacourse.com
The Easiest Way To Train Anyone... Anywhere.
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation
Luc The Perverse - 03 Nov 2005 05:02 GMT
>> Many of us in this newsgroup rely on a plenty of sites.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I don't understand what you're so upset about. Roedy's trying to help
> people. Leave him alone.
I agree.
Here is a link for Mr Pissed Off
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/gallery/silly/html/big_cup_of_STFU.html
It may annoy you to know the site may be down.
--
LTP
:)
Andrew Thompson - 03 Nov 2005 09:38 GMT
...
> It may annoy you to know the site may be down.
LOL! Don't be silly! It would only irritate the bothered person
to be told whether the link is working or not and.. (checks)
at the moment that link works fine. ;-)
Bryce - 03 Nov 2005 20:03 GMT
>>>Why don't you put this information on your site instead of here???
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Should every site heavily used by us (e.g. java.sun.com) notice us in this
>newsgroup that it has been offline for some time?
NO, But Roody's website is akin to an FAQ for this newsgroup. I think
it was very relevant.
--
now with more cowbell