>> ..multi-posting. Please refrain from doing so.
>> <http://www.physci.org/codes/javafaq.jsp#xpost>
>
> Multiposting is when the number of reposting reaches the number of 3

Signature
Andrew Thompson
physci.org 1point1c.org javasaver.com lensescapes.com athompson.info
Known To Cause Insanity In Laboratory Mice
> - Got a reference for that? My reference is RFC 1855,
> Section 3.1.3 - 'Netnews Guidelines', points 1 and 5.
> <http://www.physci.org/rfc/rfc1855.jsp#3_1_3>.
> You might try reading that sometime (before you next
> consider multi-posting to two or more groups).
ok, I don't have any RFC to refer to, but in my opinion education is a
matter of opinion, not a RFC problem. I believe that waiting people
"behind a tree" to catch them doing something we consider wrong just
for the pleasure you get in complaining reveals some kind of pestilent
thinking. I believe I was not unpolite, neither if you look my posts in
the USENET you may say I ever committed some annoying action against
noone. I just posted my question in the Help group, then, I decided the
Programmer group was better, that's all. I don't think that my
beheavior caused the wasting of anyone precious time, as the offtopic
discussion in which we are involving. I apologize .
TREMALNAIK
Andrew Thompson - 29 Jul 2005 14:03 GMT
>> - Got a reference for that? My reference is RFC 1855,
...
> ok, I don't have any RFC to refer to, ..
You can refer to the same one. I sure don't 'own' it.
It was formulated long before I ever posted to the
usenet news groups.
>..but in my opinion education is a matter of opinion,
Who's. Yours?
The prevailing opinion (by many contributors to the groups)
is that multi-posting is counter productive.
> ..I apologize .
..I do not feel you owe me (or anyone) an apology.
I would like to hear though, that you intend *not* to
multi-post in future.

Signature
Andrew Thompson
physci.org 1point1c.org javasaver.com lensescapes.com athompson.info
Featuring Gratuitous Alien Nudity