Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncementsWhite Papers
Discussion GroupsFirst AidDatabasesJavaBeansGUIJava 3DVirtual MachineCORBASecurityToolsGeneral
Java DirectoryOpen Source ProjectsSample Book ChaptersUser GroupsWeb Resources
Related Topics
Databases.NETMore Topics ...

Java Forum / General / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

RFC: Open Source Clinical system for the NHS

Thread view: 
Robert  Worrall - 31 May 2005 15:27 GMT
I work in the NHS as an IT coordinator at a medical centre. We use the EMIS
LV clinical system as do half of the practices in the UK. As a taxpayer I
would like to see my money pay for treatment not for software licences.

I propose the development of an open souce java based system (removing
clinical software licencing costs) that runs on linux (removing operating
system costs).

Does anyone else work in the NHS and would be interested in such a large
project?

I have hypothosised that java components could be bolted on to a modified
OpenOffice (mostly C++ but can have Java components). which could be used
for printing services. document creation ,etc. This would help to reduce
development time.

Any comments are very welcome.
Gerbrand van Dieijen - 31 May 2005 17:44 GMT
Robert Worrall via JavaKB.com schreef:
> I work in the NHS as an IT coordinator at a medical centre. We use the EMIS
> LV clinical system as do half of the practices in the UK. As a taxpayer I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> clinical software licencing costs) that runs on linux (removing operating
> system costs).

I am not sure what you want?
Do you have good working medical system, and would you like a free one
you won't have to pay for?
Or don't you have any system yet, and do you want the system that has to
be developed be open source?
Steve Horsley - 31 May 2005 19:31 GMT
> Robert Worrall via JavaKB.com schreef:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Or don't you have any system yet, and do you want the system that has to
>  be developed be open source?

He says that half of the NHS (UK National Health Service) already
uses EMIS LV. He wants to develop an open source equivalent.

I guess the replacement would have to implement all the features
of the original in order to gain acceptance. But the project
would have a clear direction and target feature list.

I doubt that I can help - I have never heard of the system he
wants to clone, but I am all in favour of local government using
open source - it just makes such good economic sense, provided
the authorities aree prepared to pool their investment costs.

To be honest, I think there may even be good sense in the NHS
funding development of an open source development by contract
since the cost could save so mant commercial licenses. Think of
all the reccurrent salesman salaries and shareholder dividends
they would save.

Steve
Robert  Worrall - 01 Jun 2005 12:34 GMT
Thank you for your messages.

It is a clone, or improved version of our current system I am after. I
could quite easily create a list features the system would need to provide.
It would be a large list so we could replace our current setup.

I agree that the costs of software paid by the NHS is wrong when there are
open source equivlents available. I have been trying to contact people in
NHS's national program for IT on this subject but with little response so
far.

Any other thoughts or comments are very welcome.


Free Magazines

Get these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...

Oracle MagazineNetwork ComputingComputer WorldBio-IT WorldeWeekInformation WeekInfosecurity
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.