Hi!

Ya, OK, a bit messy of a description, however, simply, FAULT TOLERANCE
, ( or /fault tolerance/ if you syntatically prefer, ) was added by
DOD? ( using eavsdroppers feedbacking thru FM radio) a requirement in
1998.

The fault tolerant circuit is made simple and the method robust, quad
processors acting as a single processor, but implies four times the
amount of memory, with stack code the code is most efficient but we
still need to operate upon possibly a large knowledge base of data (
green, red, no-signal)

( the 1c) /optional/, is mostly only of /immediate/ significance to
Intel Research, /and/, yes, a processor & memory packed in an aluminum
tube for nitrogen submersion is an option, I have previously
considered, for anyone /who may efford to develop chips/. ( filled with
a jell to remove heat from processor(s) to the aluminum tube case, live
plugin into a nitrogen submerged live electronic socket is an extreamly
delicate trick and requires much mechanical robotic precision)

Hmm, interesting question.  I once earned, twenty five years ago, more
money than I do today, but fifteen years ago I was sort of a top-guns
of programming club member, Geoff Cortright hired me for Bill Gates.
In 1996, I wrote an email to ex-President Clinton about SMP MPP FORTH (
stack machine architecture), but I got a reply back from Bill Gates
before I ever heard anything from Washington, ( ex-President Clinton is
a jerk)

What would my life be like today if Washington would have simply put
forward the question from Department of Defense to IBM ( instead of the
other way around )   From Department of Defense, "Is SMP MPP FORTH the
correct formula for most efficient silicon fabrication?" To: IBM
Defense Systems.    Oh Boy would my life be wonderful today!

HOWEVER, today I earn very little money ( am allowed), less than a
fifth of my past earnings, barely enough for my own food, shelter and
clother, and, as I have said before, less than I earned TWENTY FIVE
years ago!

I suggest the answer you seek is, "People need money to make money.",
I can't force IBM or Washington, for that matter, to serve the public
interest. I guess you'll need to complete the remaining work. ( which,
at this point, nine years down the road from my Washington
communications, mostly means fabrication facilities)

If you understand Mr. Moore's C18/X18 and the significance of 25X then
you are doing well.  Do you know why a 1 MHz 6502 processor
out-performed, in some cases, a 4.77 MHz 8086?  ( Someday, if you study
hard, you will know, Intel's deep dark secret)

Regards,

mawcowboy

Hi!

Ya, OK, a bit messy of a description, however, simply, FAULT TOLERANCE
, ( or /fault tolerance/ if you syntatically prefer, ) was added by
DOD? ( using eavsdroppers feedbacking thru FM radio) a requirement in
1998.

The fault tolerant circuit is made simple and the method robust, quad
processors acting as a single processor, but implies four times the
amount of memory, with stack code the code is most efficient but we
still need to operate upon possibly a large knowledge base of data (
green, red, no-signal)

( the 1c) /optional/, is mostly only of /immediate/ significance to
Intel Research, /and/, yes, a processor & memory packed in an aluminum
tube for nitrogen submersion is an option, I have previously
considered, for anyone /who may efford to develop chips/. ( filled with
a jell to remove heat from processor(s) to the aluminum tube case, live
plugin into a nitrogen submerged live electronic socket is an extreamly
delicate trick and requires much mechanical robotic precision)

Hmm, interesting question.  I once earned, twenty five years ago, more
money than I do today, but fifteen years ago I was sort of a top-guns
of programming club member, Geoff Cortright hired me for Bill Gates.
In 1996, I wrote an email to ex-President Clinton about SMP MPP FORTH (
stack machine architecture), but I got a reply back from Bill Gates
before I ever heard anything from Washington, ( ex-President Clinton is
a jerk)

What would my life be like today if Washington would have simply put
forward the question from Department of Defense to IBM ( instead of the
other way around )   From Department of Defense, "Is SMP MPP FORTH the
correct formula for most efficient silicon fabrication?" To: IBM
Defense Systems.    Oh Boy would my life be wonderful today!

HOWEVER, today I earn very little money ( am allowed), less than a
fifth of my past earnings, barely enough for my own food, shelter and
clother, and, as I have said before, less than I earned TWENTY FIVE
years ago!

I suggest the answer you seek is, "People need money to make money.",
I can't force IBM or Washington, for that matter, to serve the public
interest. I guess you'll need to complete the remaining work. ( which,
at this point, nine years down the road from my Washington
communications, mostly means fabrication facilities)

If you understand Mr. Moore's C18/X18 and the significance of 25X then
you are doing well.  

Regards,

mawcowboy

Hi!

Ya, OK, a bit messy of a description, however, simply, FAULT TOLERANCE
, ( or /fault tolerance/ if you syntatically prefer, ) was added by
DOD? ( using eavsdroppers feedbacking thru FM radio) a requirement in
1998.

The fault tolerant circuit is made simple and the method robust, quad
processors acting as a single processor, but implies four times the
amount of memory, with stack code the code is most efficient but we
still need to operate upon possibly a large knowledge base of data (
green, red, no-signal)

( the 1c) /optional/, is mostly only of /immediate/ significance to
Intel Research, /and/, yes, a processor & memory packed in an aluminum
tube for nitrogen submersion is an option, I have previously
considered, for anyone /who may efford to develop chips/. ( filled with
a jell to remove heat from processor(s) to the aluminum tube case,
plugging a CPU tube into a nitrogen submerged live electronic socket is
an extreamly
delicate trick and requires much mechanical robotic accuracy)

Hmm, interesting question.  I once earned, twenty five years ago, more
money than I do today, but fifteen years ago I was sort of a top-guns
of programming club member, Geoff Cortright hired me for Bill Gates.
In 1996, I wrote an email to ex-President Clinton about SMP MPP FORTH (
stack machine architecture), but I got a reply back from Bill Gates
before I ever heard anything from Washington, ( ex-President Clinton is
a jerk)

What would my life be like today if Washington would have simply put
forward the question from Department of Defense to IBM ( instead of the
other way around )   From Department of Defense, "Is SMP MPP FORTH the
correct formula for most efficient silicon fabrication?" To: IBM
Defense Systems.    Oh Boy would my life be wonderful today!

HOWEVER, today I earn very little money ( am allowed), less than a
fifth of my past earnings, barely enough for my own food, shelter and
clother, and, as I have said before, less than I earned TWENTY FIVE
years ago!

I suggest the answer you seek is, "People need money to make money.",
I can't force IBM or Washington, for that matter, to serve the public
interest. I guess you'll need to complete the remaining work. ( which,
at this point, nine years down the road from my Washington
communications, mostly means fabrication facilities)

If you understand Mr. Moore's C18/X18 and the significance of 25X then
you are doing well.

Regards,

mawcowboy

Hi!

Ya, OK, a bit messy of a description, however, simply, fault tolerant
circuit is made simple and the method robust, quad processors acting
as a single processor, but implies four times the amount of memory,
with stack code the code is most efficient but we still need to operate

upon possibly a large knowledge base of data ( green, red, no-signal)

( the 1c) /optional/, is mostly only of /immediate/ significance to
Intel Research, /and/, yes, a processor & memory packed in an aluminum
tube for nitrogen submersion is an option, I have previously
considered, for anyone /who may efford to develop chips/.

I suggest the answer you seek is, "People need money to make money.",
I can't force IBM or Washington, for that matter, to serve the public
interest. I guess you'll need to complete the remaining work. ( which,
at this point, nine years down the road from my Washington
communications, mostly means fabrication facilities)

If you understand Mr. Moore's C18/X18 and the significance of 25X then
you are doing well.

Regards,

mawcowboy