
Signature
www.designacourse.com
The Easiest Way to Train Anyone... Anywhere.
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation
Thanks for the Tip! Your first issue is correct. I only wish to move to
1.4 because I have found since Micrsoft has all of these updates 1.3.1
breaks on some XP machines. But I have been told from SUN that 1.4 fixes
this problem. And I am guessing that if I convert to 1.4 it should resolve
the open problems.
Thanks,
Mike
> > I am looking for a excellent and fast developer to convert my existing Java
> > program using (1.3.1) to the newest version of Java.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> defining what you want before you put someone in the position of having
> to deliver it.
Scott Ellsworth - 01 Dec 2003 20:53 GMT
> Thanks for the Tip! Your first issue is correct. I only wish to move to
> 1.4 because I have found since Micrsoft has all of these updates 1.3.1
> breaks on some XP machines. But I have been told from SUN that 1.4 fixes
> this problem. And I am guessing that if I convert to 1.4 it should resolve
> the open problems.
Have you tried running it under 1.4? How well does it work, and what
categories of errors are you seeing? IIRC, major changes in 1.4 that
would impact a 1.3.1 program included the focus model in Swing, and some
class library retooling.
Using the new features, like nio, logging, and assertions is a bit
bigger.
Oh, let me second Chris' point about specification. Speaking as a
consultant, I much prefer a detailed spec for what a client wants. It
makes it a lot easier to measure progress, and to make sure that the
final deliverable meets your needs. Lacking that, we end up with many
iterations over needs, which can get very expensive.
Scott
scott@alodar.com
Java, Cocoa, WebObjects, and Database Consulting
Kevin Weiner - 02 Dec 2003 14:15 GMT
> Have you tried running it under 1.4? How well does it work, and what
> categories of errors are you seeing? IIRC, major changes in 1.4 that
> would impact a 1.3.1 program included the focus model in Swing, and some
> class library retooling.
I'm still dealing with code that broke when GlyphVector was redefined
for no apparent good reason.
(Skewing the topic a little, if anyone else has pet 1.4 issues,
this is as good a place as any to air them. We can change the
thread title. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Weiner FM Software 610-997-3930 http://www.fmsware.com
Andreas Rueckert - 02 Dec 2003 08:35 GMT
>Thanks for the Tip! Your first issue is correct. I only wish to move to
>1.4 because I have found since Micrsoft has all of these updates 1.3.1
>breaks on some XP machines. But I have been told from SUN that 1.4 fixes
>this problem. And I am guessing that if I convert to 1.4 it should resolve
>the open problems.
When I looked over your page, I wasn't even sure, if you talk about client
side programming or a Servlet? Looks like you use both sides in our app,
or did I miss something?
Ciao,
Andreas
Ronald Cole - 21 Dec 2003 19:45 GMT
> Thanks for the Tip! Your first issue is correct. I only wish to move to
> 1.4 because I have found since Micrsoft has all of these updates 1.3.1
> breaks on some XP machines. But I have been told from SUN that 1.4 fixes
> this problem. And I am guessing that if I convert to 1.4 it should resolve
> the open problems.
Microsoft IE only does 1.1 + M$ extensions, IIRC.
Go to <http://www.java.com/> and click on "manual download" in the
big, green "free download" box on the right. Download the "windows
offline" installation and read the installation instructions. You'll
have 1.4 in IE before you know it.

Signature
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084 4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B