 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Java Forum / Databases / July 2005Upgrade followed by infections
Upgraded to 12.5.3, from 12.5.0, on Saturday. No problems Saturday, no problems processing Sunday (mostly C programs with a single Java app (piped through Sun Java Application Server using jDTS). Today, started receiving the following errors when processing started to get heavy: 04:00000:00502:2005/06/13 12:07:17.98 kernel current process (0x2de002ea) infected with 11 04:00000:00502:2005/06/13 12:07:17.98 kernel SQL causing error : UPDATE <blah blah> SET <this> FROM <that> WHERE <something> 04:00000:00502:2005/06/13 12:07:17.98 kernel lasterror = 0 preverror = 0 transtate = 0 04:00000:00502:2005/06/13 12:07:17.99 kernel pc: 0x000000008042e13c xsc__syslogs_setscan+0x1a8(0x00000000020000ed, 0x000001000aaedb28, 0x0000000000000000, 0x000000000000130a, 0x0000000000000000) Also receiving a good number of "infected with 10". Seeing several dozen per 15 minutes. Client connections get dropped, but this isn't being indicated in the log. Are there known issues with Sun One Java App Server or jTDS and 12.5.3? Or anything else we should know? Nothing changed between this weekend and this morning. We also changed hardware during the upgrade, but we discovered these errors were occuring during our testing (nobody told us), so I don't believe this is a network-related issue. Any help would be appreciated. -Mike > Upgraded to 12.5.3, from 12.5.0, on Saturday. [SNIP] Version 12.5.3 of *what*, for heaven's sake? Nowhere in your message do you say which RDBMS system you're actually talking about. Try reading Eric Raymond's "How to ask questions the smart way": http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html and you may begin to understand why your query does not contain enough information to allow people to help you. David Harper Cambridge, England Result of cross-posting to the Sybase group. Version 12.5.3 of Sybase. Though I apologize for the omission, I have to ask if Mr. Raymond also wrote any articles entitled "How to ask questions without sounding like a condescending a.shole"? Something simple along the lines of "Please let us know what RDBMS you are referring to" would have accomplished exactly the same thing in a much simpler, nicer way. Wouldn't you agree? -Mike On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:53:45 -0700, pokerdragon interested us by writing: > Result of cross-posting to the Sybase group. Version 12.5.3 of Sybase. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > exactly the same thing in a much simpler, nicer way. Wouldn't you > agree? Amusing. Apparently you did not bother to read the link. From the link identified, and therefore purportedly by Mr. Raymond .... " ... have a reputation for meeting simple questions with what looks like hostility or arrogance. It sometimes looks like we're reflexively rude to newbies and the ignorant. But this isn't really true. " There's more, too! Worth a read ... ;-) big <g> /Hans Yup, busted. I didn't read the link. Silly me for assuming that I would know how to ask a technical question after having done it for almost 40 years. Purely for reference and to ensure neither I nor anyone else do not take the above quote out of context, I did read the passage containing that quote, even though the link was given to supposedly show how to ask a question, not given to justify the negativity of the question's response. Not that it does. As for "time sinks", how much less time would it have taken to simply ask "Version 12.5.3 of what?" instead of "Version 12.5.3 of *what*, for heaven's sake? <snip next 6 lines of meaningless text>"? Or to simply, as is also mentioned in the above link, not responded at all? > Yup, busted. I didn't read the link. Silly me for assuming that I > would know how to ask a technical question after having done it for [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > heaven's sake? <snip next 6 lines of meaningless text>"? Or to > simply, as is also mentioned in the above link, not responded at all? I'm not really justifying excessive rudeness, but you do need to understand this is usenet. Replies are not just for you but for all readers, lurkers, etc.. If it does make someone stop and think before posting, it accomplishes something.  SignatureLee Fesperman, FFE Software, Inc. (http://www.firstsql.com) ============================================================== * The Ultimate DBMS is here! * FirstSQL/J Object/Relational DBMS (http://www.firstsql.com) > Result of cross-posting to the Sybase group. Version 12.5.3 of > Sybase. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > -Mike Actually, you multi-posted. No one here can tell that you also posted in the Sybase group. As such, given the context, his recommendation that you provide more detail in your question was entirely appropriate. Would you like other links explaining why it is not good to multi-post? I'm sure Andrew will be along any minute... SignatureVirgil Free MagazinesGet these publications absolutely FREE for up to 12 months. There are no hidden fees and no obligation. Simply choose a title, complete the application form and submit it. Read more ...
|
Reply to this Message
|
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.